States could fill policy vacuum in wake of recent Supreme Court ruling

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling expected to have sweeping impact across federal agencies, including the Department of Transportation. The decision, in a case called Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, gives judges more say in whether agencies are meeting the letter of the law. Under the previous “Chevron doctrine,” judges deferred to the expertise of federal rule makers as they interpreted laws to create rules and regulations. Now, judges will have more authority to interpret whether the rules federal agencies create match the law. That could provide a window of opportunity for those seeking to challenge a wide range of rules across the federal government, including transportation rules like a recent EPA rule that would force a faster transition to electric vehicle production. 

State DOTs’ commitment to equity made clearer through federal Request for Information

Equity, diversity, and inclusion have been of growing importance among state and federal transportation agencies, and yet there isn’t a clear consensus on how that commitment translates into tangible outcomes. A new report from the Policy Lab at Claremont McKenna College, produced in partnership with SSTI, offers some clarity through an in-depth look at state DOT responses to the USDOT’s Request for Information on transportation equity data, which was released last year.

Perception and psychology may explain why drivers speed when volume is low

Changed travel behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic has reduced congestion and vehicle miles traveled (VMT), even while traffic deaths continue to rise. Evidence shows that open roads, speeding, and other dangerous driving behaviors go hand-in-hand. But what is it about people that leads them to speed and drive dangerously in the first place?

Evidence AVs can operate in lanes as narrow as 9 feet

A recent article in the Transportation Research Record has promising findings, suggesting even current autonomous vehicle systems may be able to consistently operate in lanes as narrow as 2.75 meters, or nine feet. Narrow lanes can be a valuable traffic calming tool on corridors surrounded by urban and suburban development, making conditions safer for people walking and biking and freeing up right-of-way space for other purposes.

Getting transportation equity right

The American equity conversation has turned to law enforcement, but we know that racism also resides in the history of the built environment, and that current practice is not anti-racist enough to achieve equity. Fortunately, a lot of scholars, reporters, practitioners, and advocates—including many people of color whose voices are urgently worth seeking out in a white-dominated field—have been working to point out the problems and possible solutions.

Major roads undercut safety benefits of highly accessible places

In working with transportation agencies across the U.S., our team often faces questions about the role of safety in accessibility analysis. While we know the safety and comfort of streets clearly impacts access for people on foot or bicycle, the effects of accessibility on overall safety haven’t been clear. Fortunately, leading experts in both accessibility and traffic safety recently teamed up to answer this question.

“Dear diary, I took the bus today!” – Cost-efficient travel behavior influencers

“Soft” transportation policy measures can influence a significant reduction in personal car use, according to a new research. Six psychological variables that can affect travel behavior: attitudes; emotions; habits;  social, cultural, and moral norms; knowledge and awareness ; and capability and self-efficacy. The results show that interventions that focus on social, cultural, and moral norms have the most significant effect on travel behavior.